GROSJEAN
v.
FIRST ENERGY CORP. ET AL.
GROSJEAN
FIRST ENERGY CORP. ET AL.
541 U.S. 1010
Supreme Court of the United States (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stancle v. State, 917 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…1) the files, motion, and records in the case conclusively show that the defen [*913] dant is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or particular claim is legally insufficient. See Freeman v. State, 761 So. 2d 1055, 1061 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1010, 124 S.Ct. 2069, 158 L.Ed.2d 620 (2004). Stancle was charged in count I with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and in count II with carrying a concealed weapon. After a jury trial, Stancle was convicted of both counts and sentenced to fi…
-
Fla. Dep't of Fin. Servs. v. Freeman, 921 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2006)…by, first, moving for rehearing based on Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and [*607] second, petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari based on the same issues. See Freeman v. Florida, 541 U.S. 1010, 124 S.Ct. 2069, 158 L.Ed.2d 620 (2004) (denying review). For the latter effort, he sought $27,940.74 in fees and costs — more than ten times the statutory maximum of $2,500 plus costs. See § 27.711(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2005). The trial court grant…