GREEN LEAF NURSERY, INC., ET AL.

v.

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Williams v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 465 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 2006)
  …, 370 F. 3d at 612 (“RICO’s civil-suit provision imposes two distinct but overlapping limitations on claimants—standing and proximate cause.”); Green Leaf Nursery v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., 341 F. 3d 1292, 1307 (11th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1037, 124 S.Ct. 2094, 158 L.Ed.2d 723 (2004) (“[0]ne or more of the predicate acts [in a RICO claim] must not only be the ‘but for’ cause of the injury, but the proximate cause as well.” (citations omitted)); Mendoza, 301 F. 3d at 1168-72 (concluding tha…
• Andrx Pharms., Inc. v. Elan Corp., PLC, 421 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …istian, 85 F. 3d 1521, 1524 (11th Cir.1996). We need not accept as true, however, conclusory legal allegations made in the complaint. See Green Leaf Nursery v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., 341 F. 3d 1292, 1304 n. 12 (11th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1037, 124 S.Ct. 2094, 158 L.Ed.2d 723 (2004). Because the district court denied Andrx leave to file a second amended complaint, see R2-73 at 11, our inquiry is limited to the allegations in the first amended complaint. . As an incentive for drug manufa…
• Williams v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 411 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …370 F. 3d at 612 (“RICO’s civil-suit provision imposes two distinct but overlapping limitations on claimants— standing and proximate cause.”); Green Leaf Nursery v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Co., 341 F. 3d 1292, 1307 (11th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1037, 124 S.Ct. 2094, 158 L.Ed.2d 723 (2004) (“[O]ne or more of the predicate acts [in a RICO claim] must not only be the ‘but for’ cause of the injury, but the proximate cause as well.” (citations omitted)); Mendoza, 301 F. 3d at 1168-72 (concluding tha…