VENEMAN, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL.

v.

LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSN. ET AL.; AND NEBRASKA CATTLEMEN, INC., ET AL. V. LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (U.S. 2005)
  …on instruction did not make it clear to the jury that it could consider evidence concerning Payton’s post-crime religious conversion and the prosecutor was allowed [*136] to urge this erroneous interpretation. We granted the petition for certiorari, 541 U. S. 1062 (2004), to decide whether the Ninth Circuit’s decision was contrary to the limits on federal habeas review imposed by 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d). We now reverse. I In 1980, while spending the night at a boarding house, Pay-ton raped another boarder, Pa…
• Johanns v. Livestock Mktg. Ass'n, 544 U.S. 550 (U.S. 2005)
  …to the speech’s content, not to challenges to its compelled funding. See id., at 720-721. Compelled funding of speech, it held, [*557] may violate the First Amendment even if the speech in question is the government’s. Ibid. We granted certiorari. 541 U. S. 1062 (2004). II We have sustained First Amendment challenges to allegedly compelled expression in two categories of cases: true “compelled-speech” cases, in which an individual is obliged personally to express a message he disagrees with, imposed by th…
• Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (U.S. 2005)
  …‘Does a State’s regulatory scheme that permits in-state wineries directly to ship alcohol to consumers but restricts the ability of out-of-state wineries to do so violate the dormant Commerce Clause in light of § 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment?’ ” 541 U. S. 1062 (2004). For ease of exposition, we refer to the respondents from the Michigan challenge (Nos. 03-1116 and 03-1120) and the petitioners in the New York challenge (No. 03-1274) collectively [*472] as the wineries. We refer to their opposing parties—…