THEODORE MICLAY, JR., AND ORIENTAL STEAK HOUSE, INC., APPELLANTS,

v.

JAPANESE STEAK HOUSE, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Royal Indem. Co. v. Phillip J. Muscato et ux., 305 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
  …e jury. We believe a new trial limited to the issue of liability is proper and would not cause confusion, inconvenience, or prejudice to the rights of any party. See Larrabee v. Capeletti Bros., Inc., 158 So. 2d 540 (Fla.App.1963); Eggers v. Narron, 254 So. 2d 382 (Fla.App.1971), cert. dismissed, 263 So. 2d 213 (Fla.1972). We have considered all remaining points raised on appeal by the several parties and determine them to be without merit. Accordingly, the final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded…
• Cedars OF Lebanon Hosp. Corp. v. Orlando Silva, M.D., 476 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …le from another issue.7 See, e.g., Remsberg v. [*705] Mosley, 58 So. 2d 432 (Fla.1952); Radiant Oil Co. v. Herring, 146 Fla. 154, 200 So. 376 (1941). Compare Brinson v. Howard, 71 So. 2d 172 (Fla.1954) (explaining Remsberg, supra); Eggers v. Narron, 254 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971), cert. discharged, 263 So. 2d 213 (Fla.1972) (approving decision); Roemelmeyer v. Richard A. Marshall Insurance Agency, 223 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). Again, the record before us does not support any claim that the issues of…
• Eggers v. Narron, 256 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
  …Ordered that the following question passed upon in this court’s opinion filed October 27, 1971, 254 So. 2d 382, is certified to the Supreme Court of Florida as a question of great public interest, to wit: “Where a Plaintiff Places into Evidence Only a Part of a Deposition of an Adverse Party, Does Such Use by the [*23] Plaintiff Open the Door Under the Last…

Authorities Cited

• DeVANEY v. Bernard J. Rumsch, M.D., 228 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1969)