WALLACE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459 (U.S. 2006)
  …the court construed to limit congressional redistricting to “once per decade.” People ex rel. Salazar v. Davidson, 79 P. 3d 1221, 1231 (2003) (en banc). It therefore ordered the secretary of state to use the court-created plan. We denied certiorari. 541 U. S. 1093 (2004). The second suit Was removed to federal court by the defendants on the basis of the plaintiffs’ federal-law claims. See Keller v. Davidson, 299 F. Supp. 2d 1171, 1175 (Colo. 2004). Once Salazar was decided by the Colorado Supreme Court, the…
• Ariz. State Legis. v. Ariz. Indep. Redistricting Comm'n, 135 S. Ct. 2652 (U.S. 2015)
  …ll means for the purpose of interpretation." Ibid. "A Legislature" is "the representative body which ma [kes] the laws of the people." Ibid.; see Smiley, 285 U.S., at 365, 52 S.Ct. 397 (relying on this definition); Colorado Gen. Assembly v. Salazar, 541 U.S. 1093, 1095, 124 S.Ct. 2228, 159 L.Ed.2d 260 (2004) (Rehnquist, C.J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (same). B The unambiguous meaning of "the Legislature" in the Elections Clause as a representative body is confirmed by other provisions of the C…
• Lance v. Coffman, 549 U.S. 437 (U.S. 2007)
  …ricts are just as binding and permanent as districts created by the General Assembly,” and that the court-drawn plan must remain in effect until the next decennial census. People ex rel. Salazar v. Davidson, 79 P. 3d 1221, 1231 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U. S. 1093 (2004). The court further held that this result did not offend the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution. 79 P. 3d, at 1232. Immediately after Salazar was decided, four Colorado citizens — none of whom had participated in Salazar — fil…