FLEET TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC. AND REDWING CARRIERS, INC., PETITIONERS,

v.

JESS YARBOROUGH ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Blocker's Transfer & Storage Co. v. Jess Yarborough, 277 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1973)
  …commission shall grant same only when the existing certificate holder or holders serving such territory fail to [*12] provide service and facilities which may reasonably be required by the commission.” As we said in Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Mayo, 255 So. 2d 516 (Fla.1971), “ . . . the question presented by the statute is ‘How much ¿«satisfaction is there with the existing service and facilities?'” (p. 518) Despite the finding by the Commission that the present interlining arrangement causes delays in ser…
• Fargo VAN & Storage, Inc. v. Bevis, 314 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 1975)
  …asis supplied) This Statute places a burden on applicants to show that existing service and facilities are unsatisfactory and that the public convenience and necessity requires the granting of additional service. See Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Mayo, 255 So. 2d 516 (Fla., 1971). Despite the findings by the Commission that the grant of the requested authority will have minimal effect on the protestants, and further, a finding that the applicant serves a segment of the community which has limited or no ability…
• Alterman Transp. Lines, Inc. v. Jess Yarborough, 276 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1973)
  …lar. [*36] This Commission and the Supreme Court have recognized that when applications are filed simultaneously or near so, the testimony of the witness in each proceeding may be considered in the other. See Fleet Transport Co. of Florida v. Mason, 255 So. 2d 516 [188 So. 2d 294] and Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Mayo, 255 So. 2d 516. The record of the Refrigerated proceeding standing by itself is sufficient to warrant the grant of the authority sought. Refrigerated presently holds authority to transport all fr…

  ← 1 / 2 →