SMITH
v.
MASSACHUSETTS

U.S. | 2004-11-15
No. 03-8661
543 U.S. 986 Supreme Court of the United States (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 915 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …hat the defendant’s invocation was ambiguous and that the police could therefore properly question him further. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994); Owen v. State, 862 So. 2d 687 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 986, 125 S.Ct. 494, 160 L.Ed.2d 370 (2004). There is nothing to this argument. The detective in question specifically testified that Smith stated in no uncertain terms that he had “nothing to say” to her.1 That expression is more than sufficient. See…
  • Owen v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 41 (Fla. 2020)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw