CHIPPEWA TRADING CO.
v.
COX, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
CHIPPEWA TRADING CO.
COX, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
543 U.S. 988
Supreme Court of the United States (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miller v. King, 449 F.3d 1149 (11th Cir. 2006)…504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a). This claim was never raised in the district court, and thus we do not consider it for the first time on appeal. See Draper v. Reynolds, 369 F. 3d 1270, 1274 n.5 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 988, 125 S.Ct. 507, 160 L.Ed.2d 373 (2004). . "We review the district court’s rulings on motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same legal standards that bound the district court." Jackson v. BellSouth Telecomm., 372 F. 3d 1250, 1279 (11th…