OBER
v.
BROWN ET AL.
OBER
BROWN ET AL.
543 U.S. 1051
Supreme Court of the United States (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hughes v. State, 943 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…trict court’s opinion, and held that the district court should have abstained from hearing the claim because the defendants’ preemption claim was not facially conclusive. Hughes v. Attorney Gen. of Fla., 377 F. 3d 1258 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1051, 125 S.Ct. 881, 160 L.Ed.2d 772 (2005). Based upon controlling case law in our district, we conclude that this claim is barred by res judicata. At the time when the defendants filed their petition and we issued our mandate denying the petition on J…1 / 2
-
Cloyd v. State, 943 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…trict court’s opinion, and held that the district court should have abstained from hearing the claim because the defendants’ preemption claim was not facially conclusive. Hughes v. Attorney Gen. of Fla., 377 F. 3d 1258 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1051, 125 S.Ct. 881, 160 L.Ed.2d 772 (2005). Based upon controlling case law in our district, we conclude that this claim is barred by res judicata. At the time when the defendants filed their petition and we issued our mandate denying the petition on J…1 / 2
-
Directv, Inc. v. Imburgia, 136 S. Ct. 463 (U.S. 2015)