T. E. BLACKBURN, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF HARDEE COUNTY, AND I. G. ROYAL, J. S. CORDELL AND J. S. CARLTON, SR., BEING AND CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF HARDEE COUNTY,
v.
STATE EX REL. JOE ROBERTS, BILL WOODS, DOLAN FARABEE, TRUSTEES OF THE OAK GROVE SPECIAL TAX SCHOOL DISTRICT OF HARDEE COUNTY, AND RAYMOND PHILLIPS

Fla. | 1939-09-15
Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur., Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment., Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
140 Fla. 58 Florida Supreme Court (1939) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 191 So. 50
Cited by 9 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —

Per Curiam. —

Upon authority of T. E'. Blackburn, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Hardee County, et al., v. State ex rel. Roberts, at al., decided this day, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

*59Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lawton Chiles v. Children A, 589 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1991)
    …ne, 382 So. 2d 654 (Fla.1980); Department of Admin. v. Horne, 269 So. 2d 659 (Fla.1972); see Rosenhouse v. 1950 Spring Term Grand Jury, 56 So. 2d 445 (Fla.1952); Yon v. Orange County, 43 So. 2d 177 (Fla.1949); State ex rel. Hill v. Cone, 140 Fla. 1, 191 So. 50 (1939). The budget reductions ordered pursuant to section 216.221, Florida Statutes (1989), go to the very heart of the legislature’s taxing and spending power, and thus the children have standing to invoke this constitutional challenge. . As Justi…
  • Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Chase Fed. Hous. Corp., 737 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 1999)
    …483; Acosta v. Richter, 671 So. 2d 149, 153 (Fla.1996). In order to determine legislative intent as to retroactivity, both the terms of the statute and the purpose of the enactment must be considered. See State ex rel. Hill v. Cone, 140 Fla. 1, 17, 191 So. 50, 57 (1939); see also United States v. Olin Corp., 107 F. 3d 1506, 1513-14 (11th Cir.1997) (reviewing language, structure purpose, and legislative history to find that Congress clearly intended that liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Res…
  • Fla. Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. Buster, 984 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2008)
    …s Court emphasized, “In order to determine legislative intent as to retroactivity, both the terms of the statute and the purpose of the enactment must be considered.” 737 So. 2d at 500 (emphasis added) (citing State ex rel. Hill v. Cone, 140 Fla. 1, 191 So. 50, 57 (1939)). In that case, this Court looked to the purpose of the Dry Cleaning Contamination Cleanup Act, in addition to the Act’s language, to conclude that immunity provisions could be applied retroactively. Id. at 501-02. Likewise, in the insta…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw