WAGNON, SECRETARY, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

v.

PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION

Citator

Cited By

• Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (U.S. 2006)
  …blic employees speak in the course of carrying out their routine, required employment obligations, they have no personal interest [*417] in the content of that speech that gives rise to a First Amendment right.” Id., at 1189. We granted certiorari, 543 U. S. 1186 (2005), and we now reverse. II As the Court’s decisions have noted, for many years “the unchallenged dogma was that a public employee had no right to object to conditions placed upon the terms of employment — including those which restricted the e…
• Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche et ux., 546 U.S. 81 (U.S. 2005)
  …eral-court jurisdiction, had not demonstrated the nonexistence of “the Virginia sub-‘partnership,’ ” the Court of Appeals reasoned, id., at 621, and therefore had not met its burden of establishing diversity, id., at 621-622. We granted certiorari, 543 U. S. 1186 (2005), to resolve a division among the Circuits on the question whether an entity not named or joined as a defendant can nonetheless be deemed a real party in interest whose presence would destroy diversity. Compare 373 F. 3d, at 620-622, with Plai…
• Unitherm Food Sys., Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., 546 U.S. 394 (U.S. 2006)
  …nce capable of sustaining its asserted relevant antitrust market, and little to support any other aspect of its Section 2 claim”). Accordingly, it vacated the jury’s judgment in favor of Uni-therm and remanded for a new trial. We granted certiorari, 543 U. S. 1186 (2005), and now reverse. II Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 sets forth the procedural requirements for challenging the sufficiency of the evidence in a civil jury trial and establishes two stages for such challenges — prior to submission of the…