GORDON, AKA JONES
v.
UNITED STATES; MORTIER V. UNITED STATES; GREENE V. UNITED STATES; PIDCOKE V. UNITED STATES; POWELL V. UNITED STATES; SANCHEZ-FLORES V. UNITED STATES; SMITH V. UNITED STATES; GAONA-TOVAR V. UNITED STATES; AND DUARTE-JUAREZ V. UNITED STATES; GOODEN V. UNITED STATES; FULKS, AKA WELLINGTON V. UNITED STATES; CRUZ-PEREZ V. UNITED STATES; LOPEZ V. UNITED STATES; MENG TUAN WANG V. UNITED STATES; TELLEZ-BOIZO V. UNITED STATES; BOWDEN V. UNITED STATES; GREEN V. UNITED STATES; CHICAS-SANCHEZ V. UNITED STATES; BROOKS V. UNITED STATES; MITCHELL V. UNITED STATES; PIPKINS ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; LEVY V. UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in twenty-two consolidated cases involving federal criminal convictions and vacated the lower court judgments, remanding them for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, which held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory.
[1] A court may grant a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
[2] A court may vacate a judgment and remand a case for further consideration.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 275; No. 04-7589. No. 04-8009.
No. 04-8240.
No. 04-8251.
No. 04-8307.
No. 04-8309.
No. 04-8322.
No. 04-8326.
No. 04-8357.
No. 04-8360.
No. 04-8369.
No. 04-8374.
No. 04-8396.
No. 04-8402.
No. 04-8422.
No. 04-8429.
No. 04-8433.
No. 04-8441.
No. 04-8455.
No. 04-8505.
C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 110 Fed. Appx. 687; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 108 Fed. Appx. 814; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 278; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 299; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 110 Fed. Appx. 463; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 124 Fed. Appx. 642; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 110 Fed. Appx. 438 (first judgment) and 461 (second judgment); C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 297; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 113 Fed. Appx. 507; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 110 Fed. Appx. 457; C. A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 372 F. 3d 86; C. A. 5th Cir.; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 114 Fed. Appx. 754; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 380 F. 3d 266; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 578; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 114 Fed. Appx. 884; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 701; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 245; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 378 F. 3d 1281; and C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx.
269. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220 (2005).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hall v. Florida., 134 S. Ct. 1986 (U.S. 2014)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (U.S. 2005)
- United States v. Pipkins, 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004)