AUGUST B. TREFZ AND MARY ANN TREFZ, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
LYLE L. JOHNSON AND MARIAN E. JOHNSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1972-01-05
No. 71-200
PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
256 So. 2d 85 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record having been given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Harvey Weiner, M.D. v. Savage, 407 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
    …toppel or res judicata, we conclude that appellant failed to raise this issue by adequate pleading or proof before the trial court. Res judicata or estoppel should have been established in the answer. See Fischbein v. David Jenkins Associates, Inc., 256 So. 2d 85 (Fla.3d DCA 1971), and Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(d). Appellant’s answer denied negligence and causation and raised the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations but failed to mention res judicata or collateral estoppel. Although there wa…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw