LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
256 So. 2d 237
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1972)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
On the basis of the briefs and the record, we hold that appellant has not made error appear. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.
Affirmed.
REED, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cohodas v. Russell, 289 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)…ar in part payment balance due” on a 'described lot “and $999.00 cash.” The Supreme Court held this to be a sufficient recitation of the terms of payment as to comply with the Statute of Frauds. On the other hand, in Carnes v. Harris, Fla.App.1972, 256 So. 2d 237, the written memorandum consisted of a receipt for $400.00 “for deposits as down payment” on a described lot with “balance due $800.00 by 1 July 1970.” The court held that the receipt was not sufficiently definite to meet the requirements of the Sta…
-
Lerner v. Seymour Litwin, 442 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Carnes v. Harris, 256 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).…