EASTERN SHOSHONE TRIBE OF THE WIND RIVER RESERVATION ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES; AND UNITED STATES V. EASTERN SHOSHONE TRIBE OF THE WIND RIVER RESERVATION ET AL.
EASTERN SHOSHONE TRIBE OF THE WIND RIVER RESERVATION ET AL.
UNITED STATES; AND UNITED STATES V. EASTERN SHOSHONE TRIBE OF THE WIND RIVER RESERVATION ET AL.
544 U.S. 973
Supreme Court of the United States (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (U.S. 2006)…ill be overlooked. We granted certiorari to resolve a split of authority on whether one occupant may give law enforcement effective consent to search shared premises, as against a co-tenant who is present and states a refusal to permit the search.1 544 U. S. 973 (2005). We now affirm. [*109] II To the Fourth Amendment rule ordinarily prohibiting the warrantless entry of a person’s house as unreasonable per se, Payton v. New York, 445 U. S. 573, 586 (1980); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 454-455…
-
Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (U.S. 2006)…on and a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed, 0 Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal v. Ashcroft, 342 F. 3d 1170 (2003), as did a majority of the Circuit sitting en banc, 389 F. 3d 973 (2004). We granted certiorari. 544 U. S. 973 (2005). II Although its briefs contain some discussion of the potential for harm and diversion from the UDV’s use of hoasca, the Government does not challenge the District Court’s factual findings or its conclusion that the evidence submitted on […