S. E. W. FRIEL ET AL.
v.
MARYLAND STATE ROADS COMMISSION ET AL.
S. E. W. FRIEL ET AL.
MARYLAND STATE ROADS COMMISSION ET AL.
544 U.S. 976
Supreme Court of the United States (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kenrick Christopher v. State, 449 F.3d 1360 (11th Cir. 2006)…ustified a new trial “on all issues.” The defendants waived any argument that Hernandez or Tierney is entitled to a new trial on the basis of an excessive verdict. See Stavropoulos v. Firestone, 361 F. 3d 610, 616 n. 6 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 976, 125 S.Ct. 1850, 161 L.Ed.2d 727 (2005). It has been the law of this Circiút that parties may not seek a new trial on appeal for reasons not asserted before the district court. Twiss v. Kury, 25 F. 3d 1551, 1556 (11th Cir.1994) (“[W]e generally wi…