BISHOP
v.
UNITED STATES; KOCH V. UNITED STATES; GIORDANO V. UNITED STATES; HIGASSI, AKA AGASSI, AKA HEGGASSI V. UNITED STATES; ROBINSON V. UNITED STATES; PITTMAN V. UNITED STATES; BLOCHER V. UNITED STATES; MONTGOMERY V. UNITED STATES; NASH V. UNITED STATES; COUPAR V. UNITED STATES; DELGADO-GAMA V. UNITED STATES; ROBINSON V. UNITED STATES; SLOAN V. UNITED STATES; THIBODAUX V. UNITED STATES; BERRYMAN V. UNITED STATES; OLIVER V. UNITED STATES; BOWERS V. UNITED STATES; HERNANDEZ-NORIEGA V. UNITED STATES; HALL V. UNITED STATES; FERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ V. UNITED STATES; CHACON-AVITIA V. UNITED STATES; CONEJO-CANO V. UNITED STATES; GALLEGOS-LUERA, AKA TORRES-MONSISVAIS V. UNITED STATES; GONZALEZ-BARRAZA V. UNITED STATES; GONZALEZ-CALDERON V. UNITED STATES; GRANADOS-VASQUEZ V. UNITED STATES; MARTINEZ-MORALES, AKA MALDONADO, AKA MARTINEZ V. UNITED STATES; MUNOZ-MARQUEZ V. UNITED STATES; ONTIVEROS, AKA SAUCEDO-ONTIVEROS V. UNITED STATES; ORNELAS-ESTRADA V. UNITED STATES; PAXTOR V. UNITED STATES; POMPA-ESTRADA V. UNITED STATES; PONCE-SANCHEZ V. UNITED STATES; REYES-GURROLA V. UNITED STATES; RIVAS-GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; RUIZ-LEVARIO, AKA RUIZ V. UNITED STATES; RUIZ-LOERA, AKA RUIZ LOERA, AKA RIVERA-HERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES; ROLDAN-GIL V. UNITED STATES; SALAZAR-MONTES, AKA NOE SALAZAR, AKA SALAZAR V. UNITED STATES; VALENZUELA-LUNA V. UNITED STATES; VASQUEZ-SORIA V. UNITED STATES; ARANDA-CRUZ, AKA ARNADA-CRUZ V. UNITED STATES; CARRASCO-AVITIA V. UNITED STATES; SANCHEZ-PENA V. UNITED STATES; MARTINEZ-ESPARZA V. UNITED STATES; ORTIZ JACOBO, AKA ORTIZ-JACOBO V. UNITED STATES; MOYE V. UNITED STATES; MORRIS V. UNITED STATES; BRISEDA PEREZ, AKA ARRELLANO-GOMEZ V. UNITED STATES; TAIWO V. UNITED STATES; ALTSCHUL V. UNITED STATES; BEN V. UNITED STATES; BERNAL-ISLER V. UNITED STATES; MUNIZ-TAPIA V. UNITED STATES; DE LA CRUZ V. UNITED STATES; AND TAPIA V. UNITED STATES; SULEIMAN V. UNITED STATES; STANDRIDGE V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2005-04-25
Nos. 04-8789; No. 04-9028; No. 04-9040; No. 04-9107; No. 04-9138; No. 04-9146; No. 04-9169; No. 04-9189; No. 04-9191; No. 04-9208; No. 04-9209; No. 04-9215; No. 04-9216; No. 04-9236; No. 04-9246; No. 04-9251; No. 04-9257; No. 04-9271; No. 04-9272; No. 04-9273; No. 04-9276; No. 04-9278; No. 04-9280; No. 04-9288; No. 04-9292; No. 04-9296; No. 04-9299; No. 04-9301; No. 04-9302; No. 04-9310; No. 04-9312; No. 04-9313; No. 04-9317; No. 04-9390; No. 04-9391
544 U.S. 995 Supreme Court of the United States (2005) Positive Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in consolidated cases involving numerous criminal defendants convicted in various federal courts, vacated the lower court judgments, and remanded the cases for reconsideration in light of the Court's decision in United States v. Booker, which held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory.

Headnotes

[1] A court may grant a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

[2] A judgment may be vacated and a case remanded for further consideration in light of a subsequent Supreme Court decision.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 690; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 211; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 992; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 837; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 304; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 259; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 869; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 297; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 240; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 390 F. 3d 482; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 736; C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 118 Fed. Appx. 458; No. 04-9272. No. 04-9273.

No. 04-9276.

No. 04-9278.

No. 04-9280.

No. 04-9288.

No. 04-9292.

No. 04-9296.

No. 04-9299.

C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 219; C. A. 5th Cir.; (Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 749); (115 Fed. Appx. 725); (115 Fed. Appx. 280); (115 Fed. Appx. 749); (115 Fed. Appx. 276); (115 Fed. Appx. 729); (115 Fed. Appx. 285); (115 Fed. Appx. 286); (115 Fed. Appx. 242); (115 Fed. Appx. 283); (115 Fed. Appx. 276); (115 Fed. Appx. 284); (115 Fed. Appx. 741); (115 Fed. Appx. 272); (115 Fed. Appx. 250); (115 Fed. Appx. 269); (115 Fed. Appx. 232); (115 Fed. Appx. 249); (115 Fed. Appx. 270); (115 Fed. Appx. 241); (115 Fed. Appx. 282); and (115 Fed. Appx. 270).

C. A. 5th Cir.; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 750; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 710; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 984; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 265; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 273; C. A. 3d Cir.; No. 04-9301.

No. 04-9302.

No. 04-9310.

No. 04-9312.

No. 04-9313.

No. 04-9317.

No. 04-9390.

No. 04-9391.

C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 220; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 114 Fed. Appx. 644; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 712; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 275; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 736; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 719 (first judgment), 733 (second judgment), and 755 (third judgment); C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 463; and C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 119 Fed. Appx.

243. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220 (2005).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw