CRUZ
v.
UNITED STATES; QUINONES V. UNITED STATES; CASTRO V. UNITED STATES; BIFFLE V. UNITED STATES; CLEDANOR V. UNITED STATES; COTNEY V. UNITED STATES; BAXTER V. UNITED STATES; CAMPOS-AIZPURO V. UNITED STATES; CAMPOS-CRUZ V. UNITED STATES; CHAVEZ-DELGADO V. UNITED STATES; HERNANDEZ-ESCAJEDA V. UNITED STATES; MAGALLANES-RODRIGUEZ V. UNITED STATES; MOYA V. UNITED STATES; VALENZUELA-RIVERA, AKA RIVERA-CALDERA V. UNITED STATES; AND VIZCAINO-AMARO, AKA VIZCAINO V. UNITED STATES; VENCES V. UNITED STATES; GUARDADO-ORTEGA V. UNITED STATES; LOPEZ-TOVAR V. UNITED STATES; TREJO-HERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES; SAUZO-IZAGUIRRE V. UNITED STATES; AND LOREDO-PECINA V. UNITED STATES; THIBODEAUX V. UNITED STATES; VELOZ V. UNITED STATES; BARRON-TORRES V. UNITED STATES; CAMACHO-MUNOZ V. UNITED STATES; CAPELLAN-FIGUEREO V. UNITED STATES; JIMENEZ-CORDOVA V. UNITED STATES; MACIAS-ORTIZ V. UNITED STATES; MENDEZ-CHAVEZ V. UNITED STATES; RODRIGUEZ-VERA V. UNITED STATES; TREJO-LOPEZ V. UNITED STATES; VENEGAS-QUEZADA V. UNITED STATES; BAEZ V. UNITED STATES; CASTORENA-RAMIREZ V. UNITED STATES; GONZALEZ-LABORICO V. UNITED STATES; GUTIERREZ-GUEVARA V. UNITED STATES; HERNANDEZ-GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; HERRERA-FLORES V. UNITED STATES; IBARRA-ARELLANO V. UNITED STATES; RAMIREZ-GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; RAMOS-ZUNIGA V. UNITED STATES; RODRIGUEZ-GASPAR V. UNITED STATES; ROJAS-DE-LA ROSA V. UNITED STATES; SANCHEZ-MENDEZ V. UNITED STATES; VASQUEZ-RAMOS V. UNITED STATES; DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZ V. UNITED STATES; LOPEZ-CRUZ V. UNITED STATES; ARAGUZ-RAMIREZ V. UNITED STATES; CANTU-RIOS V. UNITED STATES; CASTILLO-BUSTAMANTE, AKA GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; MENDOZA-SIFUENTES V. UNITED STATES; TORRES-AVILA V. UNITED STATES; HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ V. UNITED STATES; VELA-SALINAS V. UNITED STATES; NIEVES-ALVAREZ V. UNITED STATES; RAMIREZ-SANTANA V. UNITED STATES; VASQUEZ-ALEJOS, AKA MAYA-GALVAN V. UNITED STATES; PEREZ-TOSTADO V. UNITED STATES; SAYAS-MONTOYA V. UNITED STATES; ROSALES V. UNITED STATES; CRUZ V. UNITED STATES; ARVIZU-GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; VACA-HERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES; ESPINOZA-CORTEZ V. UNITED STATES; LOPEZ-CRUZ V. UNITED STATES; SAN MARTIN, AKA HERNANDEZ-LOZANO V. UNITED STATES; GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; GONZALEZ-MATA, AKA GONZALEZ V. UNITED STATES; GUTIERREZ-SUAREZ V. UNITED STATES; ALANIS-GONZALES, AKA ROBLEDO-PESINA V. UNITED STATES; ROMERO RODRIGUEZ V. UNITED STATES; CISNEROS-CAVAZOS V. UNITED STATES; ARELLANO-RIOS V. UNITED STATES; RAMOS-LUCAS V. UNITED STATES; ALBARENGA-VILLALOBO V. UNITED STATES; CALTON V. UNITED STATES; LONGBINE V. UNITED STATES; GOMEZ V. UNITED STATES; GARCIA-VARGAS V. UNITED STATES; FLORES V. UNITED STATES; GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; HERNANDEZ-BAIDE V. UNITED STATES; GONZALEZ-ANTUNA V. UNITED STATES; MENCHACA-MORENO, AKA AMUNDO MENCHACA V. UNITED STATES; NAVARETTE-CASTILLO, AKA CASTILLO-NAVARETTE V. UNITED STATES; AND VARELA-MARQUEZ V. UNITED STATES; DELEON-GARCIA V. UNITED STATES; WELCH V. UNITED STATES; NAJERA-MORALES V. UNITED STATES; JACOBS V. UNITED STATES; JONES V. UNITED STATES; SZABO V. UNITED STATES; NAVARRO-GONZALEZ V. UNITED STATES; BARRERA-GONZALEZ V. UNITED STATES; COUNTERMAN V. UNITED STATES; BECK V. UNITED STATES; QUEJADA-POMARE V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON, AKA POWELL V. UNITED STATES; RESTREPO V. UNITED STATES; MERAZ-AMADO V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2005-05-02
Nos. 04-7904; No. 04-8921; No. 04-9121; No. 04-9170; No. 04-9210; No. 04-9212; No. 04-9261; No. 04-9295; No. 04-9306; No. 04-9308; No. 04-9309; No. 04-9314; No. 04-9315; No. 04-9316; No. 04-9348; No. 04-9349; No. 04-9365; No. 04-9381; No. 04-9382; No. 04-9384; No. 04-9385; No. 04-9401; No. 04-9407; No. 04-9412; No. 04-9414; No. 04-9424; No. 04-9425; No. 04-9429; No. 04-9436; No. 04-9453; No. 04-9465; No. 04-9480; No. 04-9516; No. 04-9524; No. 04-9528; No. 04-9577
544 U.S. 1013 Supreme Court of the United States (2005) Positive Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in these consolidated cases involving numerous petitioners challenging their federal sentences and vacated the lower court judgments, remanding them for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, which addressed the constitutional application of federal sentencing guidelines.

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 471; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 271 (third judgment), 279 (fifth judgment), 280 (fourth judgment), 718 (sixth judgment), 727 (first judgment), 742 (eighth judgment), 752 (second judgment), and 758 (seventh judgment); C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 223 (first judgment), 236 (third judgment), 237 (sixth judgment), 253 (fifth judgment), 254 (fourth judgment), and 288 (second judgment); C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 708; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 278; (Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 247); (115 Fed. Appx. 240); (115 Fed. Appx. 283); (115 Fed. Appx. 268); (115 Fed. Appx. 750); (115 Fed. Appx. 267); No. 04-9315.

No. 04-9316. (115 Fed. Appx. 727); (115 Fed. Appx. 241); and (115 Fed. Appx. 243).

C. A. 5th Cir.; (Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 281); (115 Fed. Appx. 248); (115 Fed. Appx. 260); (115 Fed. Appx. 747); (115 Fed. Appx. 261); (115 Fed. Appx. 748); (115 Fed. Appx. 263); (115 Fed. Appx. 263); (115 Fed. Appx. 715); (115 Fed. Appx. 247); (115 Fed. Appx. 265); and C. A. 5th Cir.; (Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 224); (115 Fed. Appx. 732); (115 Fed. Appx. 291); (115 Fed. Appx. 744); (115 Fed. Appx. 734); (115 Fed. Appx. 251); (115 Fed. Appx. 289); (115 Fed. Appx. 256); (115 Fed. Appx. 238); (115 Fed. Appx. 746); (115 Fed. Appx. 235); (115 Fed.’ Appx. 252); (115 Fed. Appx. 257); (115 Fed. Appx. 298); (115 Fed. Appx. 709); (115 Fed. Appx. 721); (115 Fed. Appx. 723); (115 Fed. Appx. 706); (115 Fed. Appx. 722); (115 Fed. Appx. 742); (117 Fed. Appx. 985); (115 Fed. Appx. 735); (115 Fed. Appx. 258); (115 Fed. Appx. 256); No. 04-9348. No. 04-9349.

No. 04-9365.

No. 04-9381.

No. 04-9382.

No. 04-9384.

No. 04-9385.

No. 04-9401.

No. 04-9407.

No. 04-9412.

No. 04-9414.

No. 04-9424.

No. 04-9425.

No. 04-9429.

No. 04-9436. (115 Fed. Appx. 255); (115 Fed. Appx. 745); (115 Fed. Appx. 740); (115 Fed. Appx. 720); (115 Fed. Appx. 733); and (115 Fed. Appx. 712).

C. A. 5th Cir.; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 982; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 221; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 855; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 288; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 122 Fed. Appx. 720; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 230; C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 392 F. 3d 1153; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 274 (second judgment), 277 (third judgment), 718 (first judgment), and 728 (fourth judgment); C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 119 Fed. Appx. 605; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 473; C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 113 Fed. Appx. 366; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 471; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 473; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 123; No. 04-9453. No. 04-9465.

No. 04-9480.

No. 04-9516.

No. 04-9524.

No. 04-9528.

No. 04-9577.

C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 886; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 121 Fed. Appx. 581; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 393 F. 3d 1088; C. A. 11th Cir.; C. A. 11th Cir.; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 976; and C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx.

370. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220 (2005).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw