QUINTANA-PEREZ
v.
UNITED STATES; SANDOVAL-QUINONES V. UNITED STATES; CARDONA V. UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON V. UNITED STATES; CUNNINGHAM V. UNITED STATES; GRAVENHORST V. UNITED STATES; ROGERS V. UNITED STATES; JACKSON V. UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON V. UNITED STATES; SANCHEZ-VILLAR V. UNITED STATES; LACHNEY V. UNITED STATES; WATKINS V. UNITED STATES; COGGINS V. UNITED STATES; HERNDON V. UNITED STATES; HANSEN V. UNITED STATES; HOOF V. UNITED STATES; PENNYWELL V. UNITED STATES; MYERS V. UNITED STATES; MESSANO V. UNITED STATES; BRANCH V. UNITED STATES; NAZARIO V. UNITED STATES; MCGHEE V. UNITED STATES; MCLERAN V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2005-05-16
Nos. 04-7979; No. 04-8308; No. 04-8576; No. 04-9496; No. 04-9502; No. 04-9509; No. 04-9515; No. 04-9540; No. 04-9547; No. 04-9549; No. 04-9550; No. 04-9552; No. 04-9555; No. 04-9563; No. 04-9568; No. 04-9569; No. 04-9576; No. 04-9601; No. 04-9603; No. 04-9620; No. 04-9665; No. 04-9701; No. 04-9754
544 U.S. 1029 Supreme Court of the United States (2005)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in twenty-two consolidated cases involving federal criminal convictions and vacated the lower court judgments, remanding them for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, which had altered sentencing law by making the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory.

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 1st Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 773; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 325; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 269; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 134 Fed. Appx. 797; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 373; C. A. 1st Cir. Reported below: 377 F. 3d 49; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 118 Fed. Appx. 669; C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 118 Fed. Appx. 772; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 205; C. A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 99 Fed. Appx. 256; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 119 Fed. Appx. 640; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 113 Fed. Appx. 720; C. A. 1st Cir.; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 393 F. 3d 665; C. A. 11th Cir.; No. 04-9569.

No. 04-9576.

No. 04-9601.

No. 04-9603.

No. 04-9620.

No. 04-9665.

No. 04-9701.

No. 04-9754.

C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 119 Fed. Appx. 603; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 119 Fed. Appx. 653; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 108 Fed. Appx. 937; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 114 Fed. Appx. 785; C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 920; C. A. 11th Cir.; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 975; and C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220 (2005).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw