HOEVENAAR
v.
LAZAROFF, WARDEN

U.S. | 2005-06-06
No. 04-534
545 U.S. 1101 Supreme Court of the United States (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Schwartz, 541 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2008)
    …buyer pays the policyholder a discount and gets the full value when the policyholder dies. The following cases detail Levy's involvement in the scheme mentioned in the text. See United States v. Levy, 374 F. 3d 1023 (11th Cir.2004), cert. granted, 545 U.S. 1101, 125 S.Ct. 2542, 162 L.Ed.2d 272 (2005) (judgment vacated and remanded for consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)); In re Fin. Federated Title & Trust, Inc., 273 B.R. 706, 719 (Bankr.S…
  • United States v. Horsfall, 552 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2008)
    …rmation about the defendant’s offenses, because nothing in the agreement prevented the government from providing such information and the government fulfilled its obligation to recommend a particular sentence), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 545 U.S. 1101, 125 S.Ct. 2542, 162 L.Ed.2d 272 (2005), affirmed, 416 F. 3d 1273 (11th Cir.2005). In United States v. Carrazana, 921 F. 2d 1557, 1569 (11th Cir.1991), the plea agreement prohibited the government from recommending a sentence, but permitted it to i…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw