HUGGINS

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• England v. State, 940 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2006)
  …evidence of similar crimes committed by another person for exculpatory purposes, generally referred to as ‘reverse Williams rule evidence,’ is subject to an abuse of discretion review.” Huggins v. State, 889 So. 2d 743, 761 (Fla.2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1107, 125 S.Ct. 2546, 162 L.Ed.2d 280 (2005). The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in excluding this evidence. During the penalty phase, England filed a notice of intent to introduce reverse Williams rule evidence. England claimed this evidence…
• Quawn M. Franklin v. State, 965 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2007)
  …s presented during the penalty phase by the victim’s husband, mother, and best friend regarding their relationship with the victim and the loss they suffered due to her murder were appropriate victim-impact evidence under the statute), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1107, 125 S.Ct. 2546, 162 L.Ed.2d 280 (2005); Farina v. State, 801 So. 2d 44, 52 (Fla.2001) (finding no error in admitting testimony by twelve of the victim’s friends and family members about the impact of her murder because it came within parameters of…
• Coday v. State, 946 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 2006)
  …part and dissenting in part). In one case, the jury unanimously found all five aggravators beyond a reasonable doubt but recommended death by a vote of only nine to three. See [*1024] Huggins v. State, 889 So. 2d 743, 753 (Fla. 2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1107, 125 S.C.t. 2546, 162 L.Ed.2d 280 (2005). In another, not cited in Steele, the jury unanimously found the single aggravator of previous conviction of a violent felony but recommended death by a vote of only eight to four. See Rodgers v. State, No. S…