FRANCIS CLAIRE SANFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1972-01-18
No. 71-1041
Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
256 So. 2d 521 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Topics
Anders V. California Procedure Frivolous Appeal

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ingraham v. State, 261 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1972)
    …Certiorari denied. 256 So. 2d 521. ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw