MARYLAND

v.

BLAKE

Citator

Cited By

• Perrine v. State, 919 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …r after Edwards violation insufficient to constitute waiver of right to counsel); Blake v. Maryland, 381 Md. 218, 849 A. 2d 410, 422 (2004) (no break in custody and twenty-eight minute time lapse), cert, dismissed as improvidently granted, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 602, — L.Ed.2d - (2005); see generally McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171, 177, 111 S.Ct. 2204, 2208, 115 L.Ed.2d 158 (1991) (dictum) (suspect’s responses to post-invocation of counsel questioning in counsel’s absence presumed involuntary “assuming there…
• Loggins v. Thomas, 654 F.3d 1204 (11th Cir. 2011)
  …; Duncan v. State, 925 So. 2d 245, 252 (Ala.Crim.App.2005). And Alabama law is what the Alabama courts hold that it is. See Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407, 425, 128 S.Ct. 2641, 2652, 171 L.Ed.2d 525 (2008); Bradshaw v. Richey, 546 U.S. 74, 76, 126 S.Ct. 602, 604, 163 L.Ed.2d 407 (2005); Bolender v. Singletary, 16 F. 3d 1547, 1571 (11th Cir.1994). So, Alabama law did require the imposition of a mandatory life without parole sen-fence after Loggins’ death sentence was set aside, as the Alabama Court of…
• Derrell J. Chamblee v. State, 905 F.3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2018)
  …4(d)(1)(A) ). In this case, the state court treated Chamblee's judgment as final under Florida law, and, in habeas proceedings, we are bound by a state court's interpretation of its own laws and procedures. See Bradshaw v. Richey, 546 U.S. 74, 76, 126 S.Ct. 602, 163 L.Ed.2d 407 (2005) ("We have repeatedly held that a state court's interpretation of state law ... binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus."). Specifically, the First District Court of Appeal expressly stated in its August 8, 2012 decis…

  ← 1 / 2 →