STILLEY
v.
DICKEY, CHIEF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, ET AL.
STILLEY
DICKEY, CHIEF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, ET AL.
546 U.S. 816
Supreme Court of the United States (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Zoltan Barati & Motorola, Inc., 150 So. 3d 810 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…missal, where the Attorney General has declined to intervene, would put the similar federal statute on “constitutionally unsteady ground.” See United States ex. rel. Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co. LLC, 397 F. 3d 925, 934-35 (10th Cir.2005), cert, den., 546 U.S. 816,126 S.Ct. 341,163 L.Ed.2d 52 (2005). Unlike the Florida qui tam statute, the federal provision specifically authorizes a judicial hearing before the gov [*815] ernment may dismiss the action, but even under this language, courts have recognized th…