IN RE SHUMATE
IN RE SHUMATE
546 U.S. 975
Supreme Court of the United States (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (U.S. 2006)…versation in which McCottry identified Davis was not testimonial, and that if other portions of the conversation were testimonial, admitting them was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 154 Wash. 2d, at 305, 111 P. 3d, at 851. We granted certiorari. 546 U. S. 975 (2005). B In Hammon v. Indiana, No. 05-5705, police responded late on the night of February 26, 2003, to a “reported domestic disturbance” at the home of Hershel and Amy Hammon. 829 N. E. 2d 444, 446 (Ind. 2005). They found Amy alone on the front…1 / 2
-
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 548 U.S. 30 (U.S. 2006)…retroactive effect in Fernandez-Vargas’s case. 394 F. 3d, at 886, 890-891. We granted certiorari to resolve a split among the Courts of Appeals over the application of § 241(a)(5) to an alien who reentered illegally before IIRIRA’s effective date,5 546 U. S. 975 (2005), and we now affirm. [*37] III Statutes are disfavored as retroactive when their application “would impair rights a party possessed when he acted, increase a party’s liability for past conduct, or impose new duties with respect to transaction…