PEREZ
v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION

U.S. | 2005-10-31
No. 04-1543
546 U.S. 976 Supreme Court of the United States (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ayala v. State, 976 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
    …urt had “inherent judicial power” to impanel sentencing jury in response to Blakely); Smylie v. State, 823 N.E. 2d 679, 684-85 (Ind.2005) (holding that to meet Blakely requirements, jury may be convened to consider sentencing factors), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 976, 126 S.Ct. 545 (2005); Aragon v. Wilkinson, 209 Ariz. 61, 97 P. 3d 886, 891 (2004) (stating that “although the statutory sentencing scheme does not currently provide for convening a jury trial during the sentencing phase of a non-capital case, nothi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw