OCALA STUD FARMS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL F. DRINKHOUSE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Ocala Stud Farms appeals a summary judgment in favor of a customer who sought refund of a $2,500 stud fee under a Stallion Service Contract requiring proof by veterinarian's certificate that a foal failed to stand and nurse without assistance. The court reversed, holding that factual disputes precluded summary judgment.
Summary judgment was improper because genuine and material issues of fact existed in dispute, including whether the foal stood and nursed without assistance. The existence of factual disputes precluded entry of summary judgment even though affidavits were presented.
[1] A summary judgment is improper when genuine issues of material fact remain in dispute.
[2] A contract provision requiring a veterinarian's certificate to establish a fact is not satisfied by an affidavit from a farm manager.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[Summary] judgments should be sparingly granted and only in those cases where there remains no genuine issue of any material fact.”
Establishes the strict standard for summary judgment under Florida law
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceUnder a Stallion Service Contract between Ocala Stud Farms and Drinkhouse, the mare Miss Percent became pregnant and delivered a foal. The contract re…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Genuine Issue Of Material Fact cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal is taken from an entry of a summary judgment in favor of the appellee.
Appellant and appellee entered into a Stallion Service Contract in furtherance of which the mare, Miss Percent, became pregnant and delivered a foal. The Service Contract called for a refund of the stud fee if the foal failed to stand and nurse without assistance. The contract further states that this fact must be established by a veterinarian’s certificate. Miss Percent’s foal died within four days of birth and ap-pellee sued for a refund of the $2,500.00 stud fee, citing as proof the affidavit of the farm manager that the foal did not stand and nurse without assistance and attached the affidavit of the general manager of Ocala Stud Farms to that effect. Under these circumstances, appellee was not entitled to a summary judgment and the trial court erred in holding to the contrary.
Rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A., states that a summary judgment shall be rendered when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. The Florida Supreme Court in Williams v. City of Lake City, 62 So.2d 732 (1953), stated:
“. . . [Summary] judgments should be sparingly granted and only in those cases where there remains no genuine issue of any material fact. To put it another way, such motion should be granted only where the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. It was never intended by this rule that cases should be tried by affidavit or that affidavits, interrogatories or depositions or similar evidence, could be used as substitutes for a jury trial. To sum it all up, if there are issues of fact and the slightest doubt remains a summary judgment cannot be granted.” (Emphasis supplied)
In the instant case there are genuine and material issues of fact in dispute. One *588such issue is whether the foal stood and nursed without assistance. Although there might be other issues, the existence of this one is sufficient to preclude the entry of a summary judgment. Therefore, the judgment appealed is reversed and the cause remanded to the lower court for trial.
SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Helm v. Kohuth, 274 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)…udgment as a matter of law upon this issue. Weinstein v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Co., Fla.App.1962, 141 So. 2d 318; Wahlberg v. Miami Military Academy, Fla.App. 1969, 227 So. 2d 531; Ocala Stud Farms, Inc. v. Drinkhouse, Fla.App.1972, 257 So. 2d 587. The final judgment and assessment of costs hinged upon the above decision and same must be and are reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to grant the parties a full trial upon the issue of the reformation of the release and for further…
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. City OF Lake City, 62 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 1953)