NOKIA, INC., ET AL.
v.
NAQUIN ET AL.; AND CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ET AL. V. PINNEY ET AL.
NOKIA, INC., ET AL.
NAQUIN ET AL.; AND CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ET AL. V. PINNEY ET AL.
546 U.S. 998
Supreme Court of the United States (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Frost v. State, 53 So. 3d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…f a police dog’s reliability to provide probable cause for a warrantless search. Frost relies on the first line of cases, which began with Matheson v. State, 870 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review dismissed, 896 So. 2d 748 (Fla.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 998, 126 S.Ct. 545, 163 L.Ed.2d 499 (2005). In Matheson, the Second District held that a dog’s alert to the presence of drugs may provide probable cause, but not by itself; proof that a narcotic dog has been trained and certified is insufficient in and…