ANDERSON
v.
SOLOMON, WARDEN
ANDERSON
SOLOMON, WARDEN
546 U.S. 1017
Supreme Court of the United States (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cherry v. State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007)…the twenty-six jurisdictions with mental retardation statutes have a cutoff of seventy or two standard deviations below the mean. Bowling v. Commonwealth, 163 S.W. 3d 361, 373-74(Ky.) [*714] (upholding use of seventy IQ score cutoff), cert, denied, 546 U.S. 1017, 126 S.Ct. 652, 163 L.Ed.2d 528 (2005).…
-
Nixon v. State, 2 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 2009)…ions with mental retardation statutes have a cutoff of seventy or two standard deviations below the mean.” 959 So. 2d at 713 n. 8 (citing Bowling v. Commonwealth, 163 S.W. 3d 361, 373-74(Ky.) (upholding use of seventy IQ score cutoff), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1017, 126 S.Ct. 652, 163 L.Ed.2d 528 (2005)). . Nixon makes a number of assertions questioning this Court’s Cheny decision. All of these arguments are versions of his main argument that an IQ of 70 or below should not be the standard and that such a sta…
-
Kilgore v. State, 55 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 2010)…ons with mental retardation statutes have a cutoff of seventy or two standard deviations below the mean.” 959 So. 2d at 713 n. 8 (citing Bowling v. Commonwealth, 163 S.W. 3d 361, 373-74 (Ky.) (upholding use of seventy IQ score cutoff), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1017, 126 S.Ct. 652, 163 L.Ed.2d 528 (2005)). [N.5] Nixon makes a number of assertions questioning this Court’s Cherry decision. All of these arguments are versions of his main argument that an IQ of 70 or below should not be the standard and that such…