ANDERSON
v.
SOLOMON, WARDEN

U.S. | 2005-11-14
No. 05-6250
546 U.S. 1017 Supreme Court of the United States (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cherry v. State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007)
    …the twenty-six jurisdictions with mental retardation statutes have a cutoff of seventy or two standard deviations below the mean. Bowling v. Commonwealth, 163 S.W. 3d 361, 373-74(Ky.) [*714] (upholding use of seventy IQ score cutoff), cert, denied, 546 U.S. 1017, 126 S.Ct. 652, 163 L.Ed.2d 528 (2005).…
  • Nixon v. State, 2 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 2009)
    …ions with mental retardation statutes have a cutoff of seventy or two standard deviations below the mean.” 959 So. 2d at 713 n. 8 (citing Bowling v. Commonwealth, 163 S.W. 3d 361, 373-74(Ky.) (upholding use of seventy IQ score cutoff), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1017, 126 S.Ct. 652, 163 L.Ed.2d 528 (2005)). . Nixon makes a number of assertions questioning this Court’s Cheny decision. All of these arguments are versions of his main argument that an IQ of 70 or below should not be the standard and that such a sta…
  • Kilgore v. State, 55 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 2010)
    …ons with mental retardation statutes have a cutoff of seventy or two standard deviations below the mean.” 959 So. 2d at 713 n. 8 (citing Bowling v. Commonwealth, 163 S.W. 3d 361, 373-74 (Ky.) (upholding use of seventy IQ score cutoff), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1017, 126 S.Ct. 652, 163 L.Ed.2d 528 (2005)). [N.5] Nixon makes a number of assertions questioning this Court’s Cherry decision. All of these arguments are versions of his main argument that an IQ of 70 or below should not be the standard and that such…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw