F. H. BODEKER, APPELLANT,
v.
R. S. MCCORMICK, APPELLEE
F. H. BODEKER, APPELLANT,
R. S. MCCORMICK, APPELLEE
101 Fla. 585
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 134 So. 541
Cited by 106 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and "Whitfield, and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (27 total)
-
City OF Miami v. Irwin Kayfetz, 92 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 1957)…ts. State ex rel. Simpson v. Ackerly, 1915, 69 Fla. 23, 67 So. 232. If reasonable argument exists on the question of whether an ordinance is arbitrary or unreasonable, the legislative will must prevail. State ex rel. Skillman v. City of Miami, 1931, 101 Fla. 585, 134 So. 541. There can be no question that the City of Miami, under its police power, has the right to enact reasonable regulations concerning the sale of alcoholic beverages, as well as other acts in the conduct of such business which do not dire…
-
Blitch v. City of Ocala, 142 Fla. 612 (Fla. 1940)…abitants and their property from fire. See McQuillin on Municipal Corporations, Vol. 3, page 2061, Sec. 948; Dillon on Municipal Corporations, 5th ed., Sec. 727. In support of the general principle involved, see State v. City of Miami, 101 Fla. 585, 134 So. 541. Ordinances such as the one here under consideration are enacted under the general police power, and “they must not (1) infringe the constitutional guarantees of the nation or State by (a) invading personal or property rights unnecessarily or unrea…1 / 2
-
Philbrick v. City of Miami Beach, 147 Fla. 538 (Fla. 1941)…an undertaking business in a residential district, contrary to the inhibitions of the city’s zoning ordinance, a nuisance per se ? In his final decree, the learned chancellor cites the case of State ex rel. Skillman v. City of Miami, 101 Fla. 585, 134 So. 541. This was a habeas corpus case, but in that case this Court held in effect that it was within the police power of the City of Miami to prohibit the location and conducting of a funeral home [*545] or mortuary in a residential section of the City. In…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 27 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence