DRURY

v.

UNITED STATES; JAFFE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL ET AL.; DASH V. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE; WHITFIELD V. ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION ET AL.; POWELL V. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., ET AL.; MADDEN ET AL. V. DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP, ET AL.; IN RE HEIMERMANN, SHESHTAWY ET AL. V. SHESHTAWY; MERRITT V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; MERCER V. THOMAS ET AL.; DUVALL V. SACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ET AL.; REILLY V. WEISS ET AL.; DAVIDSON ET AL. V. VIVRA INC. ET AL.; AND DAVIDSON V. MEEHAN ET AL.; SCHWIEGERATH V. SCHWIEGERATH; CLEMONS V. ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; MARES V. UNITED STATES; BALLINGER V. UNITED STATES; HOLLOWAY V. MCI TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.; TAYLOR V. DIVISION OF DELAWARE POLICE ET AL.; GUINN, AKA QUINN V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; HARRIS V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; ROBERSON V. UNITED STATES; KEY V. BETT, WARDEN; YEKIMOFF V. SEASTRAND ET AL.; REXELLE V. CALIFORNIA; PARSON V. WILMER HUTCHINS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; HULTZ V. KEMNA, SUPERINTENDENT, CROSSROADS CORRECTIONAL CENTER; COSTA V. YOUNG ET AL.; RENEE V. PENNSYLVANIA; WINSTON V. VIRGINIA; IN RE BELLON, MORA V. FLORIDA; WOLF ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CHUMPIA V. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ET AL.; GARCIA V. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES ET AL.; RONE V. BOOKER, WARDEN; ANTONIO V. PEARSON, WARDEN; BENNER V. COYLE, WARDEN; RICHARDSON V. UNITED STATES; REVELS V. WIMP ET AL.; TURNER V. HOWERTON, WARDEN; IN RE VAUGHAN, BATES V. BELL, WARDEN; WHEELER V. FLORIDA; DEUTSCH V. UNITED STATES; IRONS V. UNITED STATES; LAFONTAINE V. UNITED STATES; ASTER V. ASTER; MCWILLIAMS V. AMSTAFF ET AL.; JONES V. PENNSYLVANIA; IN RE DENNIS, MARTIN V. UNITED STATES; YAKOVLEV V. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL; ALCORN V. UNITED STATES; SERRANO V. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL.; FIELDS V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA; MATHIS V. UNITED STATES; GOODRICH V. CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JOHNSON V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; NEIDIG V. UNITED STATES; JACKSON V. UNITED STATES; ROWE V. CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CARSWELL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CARSWELL, DECEASED V. BOROUGH OF HOMESTEAD, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.; FERNANDEZ-PENA V. UNITED STATES; PACHINGER V. UNITED STATES; RAHEMAN V. UNITED STATES; TOTARO V. UNITED STATES; MURRAY V. MANN; NUNLEY V. ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; SEARLES V. RELIC ET AL.; ROBINSON V. FOLINO, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENE; HARRINGTON V. UNITED STATES; GOLDMAN V. FAIRBANKS CAPITAL CORP. ET AL.; IN RE GARZA, BIROTTE V. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL; B. L. V. FRANKLIN COUNTY CHILDREN SERVICES; ABNEY V. UNITED STATES; CHIMNEY V. UNITED STATES; JIAYANG HUA V. UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ET AL.; MONTALVO V. UNITED STATES; VAUGHAN V. UNITED STATES; COUNCE V. NORWOOD, WARDEN; GILFORD V. UNITED STATES; IN RE KORNAFEL, ZIED-CAMPBELL V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE; TANNER V. UNITED STATES; RUBIO V. UNITED STATES; ALANIZ V. UNITED STATES; DE LA CRUZ V. UNITED STATES; GARCIA-RAMIREZ V. UNITED STATES; MUNOZ-TAPIA V. UNITED STATES; GONZALEZ V. UNITED STATES; AND MUNIZ-HERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES; SANTILLANA V. UNITED STATES; ELIZARRARAZ V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2005-11-28

Nos. 04-1438; No. 04-1536; No. 04-1573; No. 04-1576; No. 04-1630; No. 04-1636; No. 04-1664; No. 04-1669; No. 04-1675; No. 04-1676; No. 04-1685; No. 04-1686; No. 04-1687; No. 04-1730; No. 04-9356; No. 04-9517; No. 04-9627; No. 04-10012; No. 04-10017; No. 04-10151; No. 04-10162; No. 04-10168; No. 04-10194; No. 04-10206; No. 04-10239; No. 04-10241; No. 04-10247; No. 04-10302; No. 04-10347; No. 04-10411; No. 04-10429; No. 04-10470; No. 04-10473; No. 04-10475; No. 04-10486; No. 04-10503; No. 04-10512; No. 04-10569; No. 04-10580; No. 04-10582; No. 04-10668; No. 04-10670; No. 04-10672; No. 04-10692; No. 04-10696; No. 04-10698; No. 05-81; No. 05-125; No. 05-133; No. 05-303; No. 05-5016; No. 05-5077; No. 05-5088; No. 05-5111; No. 05-5144; No. 05-5168; No. 05-5174; No. 05-5201; No. 05-5231; No. 05-5234; No. 05-5287; No. 05-5353; No. 05-5377; No. 05-5386; No. 05-5398; No. 05-5437; No. 05-5483; No. 05-5499; No. 05-5548; No. 05-5550; No. 05-5589; No. 05-5636; No. 05-5672; No. 05-5673; No. 05-5700; No. 05-5719; No. 05-5783; No. 05-5804; No. 05-5888; No. 05-5930; No. 05-5937; No. 05-5998; No. 05-6158; No. 05-6190; No. 05-6192; No. 05-6293; No. 05-6320; No. 05-6421; No. 05-6428

546 U.S. 1055 Supreme Court of the United States (2005) Positive Treatment

Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The court affirmed in part and reversed in part the dismissal of Phillip Ennis's two petitions for habeas corpus, affirming the dismissal of the second petition challenging his civil commitment as a sexually violent predator on Ex Post Facto and double jeopardy grounds, but reversing the dismissal of the first petition which challenged the legality of his detention based on alleged inaccuracies in expert reports and non-compliance with statutory time standards.

Holding

The court affirmed the dismissal of the second petition, finding no merit to the Ex Post Facto and double jeopardy claims, but reversed the dismissal of the first petition, remanding for consideration of the claims regarding inaccurate expert reports and non-compliance with time standards.

Facts & Procedural History

Phillip Ennis, facing civil commitment as a sexually violent predator, filed two petitions for habeas corpus. The first petition challenged his detent…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Opinion of the Court

ante, p. 813; ante, p. 816; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 808; ante, p. 823; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 826; ante, p. 828; ante, p. 828; ante, p. 829; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 842; ante, p. 842; ante, p. 842;. ante, p. 845; ante, p. 847; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 854; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 856; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 860; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 865; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 873; ante, p. 875; ante, p. 875; ante, p. 939; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 882; ante, p. 883; ante, p. 885; ante, p. 887; ante, p. 887; ante, p. 889; ante, p. 890; ante, p. 890; ante, p. 893; ante, p. 897; ante, p. 899; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 802; ante, p. 902; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 909; ante, p. 910; ante, p. 941; ante, p. 912; ante, p. 943; ante, p. 810; ante, p. 944; ante, p. 945; ante, p. 916; ante, p. 917; ante, p. 919; ante, p. 920; ante, p. 921; ante, p. 923; ante, p. 950; ante, p. 959; ante, p. 965; ante, p. 954; ante, p. 956; ante, p. 968; and ante, p.

968. Petitions for rehearing denied. No. 04-9517. No. 04-9627. No. 04-10012. No. 04-10017. No. 04-10151. No. 04-10162. No. 04-10168. No. 04-10194. No. 04-10206. No. 04-10239. No. 04-10241. No. 04-10247. No. 04-10302. No. 04-10347. No. 04-10411. No. 04-10429. No. 04-10470. No. 04-10473. No. 04-10475. No. 04-10486. No. 04-10503. No. 04-10512. No. 04-10569. No. 04-10580. No. 04-10582. No. 04-10668. No. 04-10670. No. 04-10672. No. 04-10692. No. 04-10696. No. 04-10698. No. 05-81. No. 05-125. No. 05-133. No. 05-303. No. 05-5016. No. 05-5077. No. 05-5088. No. 05-5111. No. 05-5144. No. 05-5168. No. 05-5174. No. 05-5201. No. 05-5231. No. 05-5234. No. 05-5287. No. 05-5353. No. 05-5377. No. 05-5386. No. 05-5398. No. 05-5437. No. 05-5483. No. 05-5499. No. 05-5548. No. 05-5550. No. 05-5589. No. 05-5636. No. 05-5672. No. 05-5673. No. 05-5700. No. 05-5719. No. 05-5783. No. 05-5804. No. 05-5888. No. 05-5930. No. 05-5937. No. 05-5998. No. 05-6158. No. 05-6190. No. 05-6192. No. 05-6293. No. 05-6320. No. 05-6421. No. 05-6428.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Drury v. United States, 507 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2007)

…U.S. 813, 126 S.Ct. 336, 163 L.Ed.2d 48 (2005). If the statute of limitations began then, Drury had until October 3, 2006 to file his § 2255 motion. The Supreme Court denied his petition for rehearing on November 28, 2005. Drury v. United States, 546 U.S. 1055, 126 S.Ct. 716, 163 L.Ed.2d 613 (2005). Drury, through counsel, filed this § 2255 motion to vacate on November 27, 2006, which was more than one year after the denial of the petition for certiorari, but less than one year after the denial of his p…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw