HANFT, UNITED STATES NAVY COMMANDER, CONSOLIDATED NAVAL BRIG
v.
PADILLA

U.S. | 2006-01-04
No. 05A578
546 U.S. 1084 Supreme Court of the United States (2006)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court granted the Government's application to transfer Jose Padilla from military custody to federal civilian custody to face criminal charges, while reserving consideration of Padilla's pending petition challenging his military detention. The Court's decision allowed the transfer to proceed despite the Fourth Circuit's concerns that it might moot the certiorari petition, establishing that custody transfers could be authorized even when habeas corpus proceedings were pending before the Court.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Jose Padilla has filed a petition for writ of certiorari, seeking review of the Fourth Circuit’s judgment upholding his detention by military authorities. See Padilla v. Hanft, United States Navy Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig, No. 05-533, now pending before the Court (filed Oct. 25, 2005).

On November 22, 2005, the Government filed a motion before the Fourth Circuit, seeking approval to transfer Padilla from military custody to the custody of the warden of a federal detention center in Florida, to face criminal charges contained in an indictment filed November 17, 2005. See this Court’s Rule 36.1 (“Pending review in this Court of a decision in a habeas corpus proceeding . . . the person having custody of the prisoner may not transfer custody to another person unless the transfer is authorized under this Rule”).

Padilla agreed that the transfer should be approved. The Fourth Circuit denied the request, citing concern that transfer might affect this Court’s consideration of the pending petition for writ of certiorari and concluding that the “decision should be made not by this court but, rather, by the Supreme Court of the United States.” No. 05-6396 (CA4, Dec. 21, 2005), p. 3.

The Solicitor General has now filed with this Court an Application Respecting the Custody and Transfer of Jose Padilla, seeking the same authorization previously sought from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Padilla has filed a response, arguing instead that the Court should delay his release from military custody and consider his release along with his petition for writ of certiorari. The Government’s application, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, granted. The Court will consider the pending petition for writ of certiorari in due course.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw