JONES

v.

FLOWERS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (U.S. 2006)
  …that required to invoke the emergency aid exception. Although it found the case “a close and difficult call,” the court nevertheless concluded that the officers’ entry was not justified by exigent circumstances. Id., at 515. We granted certiorari, 546 U. S. 1085 (2006), in light of differences among state courts and the Courts of Appeals concerning the appropriate Fourth Amendment standard governing warrantless entry by law enforcement in an emergency situation. Compare In re Sealed Case 96-3167, 153 F. 3d…
• United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140 (U.S. 2006)
  …olated respondent’s [*144] Sixth Amendment right to paid counsel of his choosing. See id., at 928-932. The court then concluded that this Sixth Amendment violation was not subject to harmless-error review. See id., at 932-935. We granted certiorari. 546 U. S. 1085 (2006). II The Sixth Amendment provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” We have previously held that an element of this right is the right of a defenda…
• Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Murphy et vir, 548 U.S. 291 (U.S. 2006)
  …Rep. No. 99-687, p. 5 (1986)). Based on these authorities, the court concluded that it was required to interpret the IDEA to authorize the award of the costs that prevailing parents incur in hiring experts. 402 F. 3d, at 336. We granted certiorari, 546 U. S. 1085 (2006), to resolve the conflict among the Circuits with respect to whether Congress authorized the compensation of expert fees to prevailing parents in IDEA actions. Compare Goldring v. District of Columbia, 416 F. 3d 70, 73-77 (CADC 2005); Neosho R…