WALTER ELLIOTT, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1972-02-17
No. O-485
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
258 So. 2d 50 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Colbath v. Colbath, 268 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 1972)
    …ADKINS, Justice. By petition for certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District (Colbath v. Colbath, 258 So. 2d 50), which allegedly conflicts with a prior decision of this Court (Markland v. Markland, 155 Fla. 629, 21 So. 2d 145), as well as prior decisions of the District Court of Appeal, Third District (Mays v. Mays, 203 So. 2d 674; Witlin v. Witlin, 206 So.…
  • Davis H. Barringer v. Barringer, 265 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
    …pp.1965), 177 So. 2d 384; and Harris v. Harris (Fla.App.1962), 138 So. 2d 376. For a more complete discussion of when parties in a modification proceeding are entitled to attorneys’ fees and when they are not, see, Colbath v. Colbath (Fla.App.1972), 258 So. 2d 50.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw