JANE ROSALIND ANKNEY, APPELLANT,
v.
BILL C. ANKNEY, JR., APPELLEE
JANE ROSALIND ANKNEY, APPELLANT,
BILL C. ANKNEY, JR., APPELLEE
258 So. 2d 335
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1972)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, we conclude that no error has been demonstrated and the final judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Affirmed.
REED, C. J., MAGER, J., and CARLTON, CHARLES T., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.D. Nichols & NTS Corp. v. Jeno Paulucci and Silver Lakes, 652 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…with the OLF joint venture, as well as the degree of control NTS exercised over NTS/Residential and OLF, Inc. See Universal Caribbean Establishment v. Bard, 543 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). See also Richard Bertram & Co. v. American Marine, Ltd., 258 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). The evidence showed that NTS was engaged in the following activities in Florida: NTS was a guarantor on the OLF joint venture’s $13 million loan held by Banc One; NTS’s consolidated accounting system performed accounting service…
-
Universal Caribbean Establishment v. Bard, 543 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…cts, taken as a whole, shows that Universal Caribbean did engage in substantial activity in this state through Limited. See American Hoist and Derrick Co. v. Duran, 451 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Richard Bertram & Co. v. American Marine Limited, 258 So. 2d 335 (Fla.1972); cf. Bradbery v. Frank L. Savage, Inc., 190 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966). Thus, jurisdiction over Universal in Florida does not offend constitutional principles. See International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L…
-
Sonnenblick-Goldman OF Miami Corp. v. Feldman, 266 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…of Florida. We think that the evidence before the trial court was sufficient to sustain appellee’s allegation that the New York corporation was doing business in the State of Florida. See Richard Bertram & Co. v. American Marine, Ltd., Fla.App.1972, 258 So. 2d 335; Fashion Two Twenty, Inc. v. Ralph and Reba, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 254 So. 2d 49. The second point urges that the trial court erred in not providing a full ev-identiary hearing when the appellant moved to quash service of process. A reading of the re…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence