RODRIGUEZ
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2006-01-17
No. 05-7011
546 U.S. 1140 Supreme Court of the United States (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bower v. Texas., 135 S. Ct. 1291 (U.S. 2015)
    …conclusion in similar circumstances. See ibid.(citing Coble v. Dretke,417 F.3d 508 (2005); Boyd v. Johnson,167 F.3d 907 (1999); Barnard v. Collins,958 F.2d 634 (1992)). Bower then sought certiorari here, but we denied his petition. Bower v. Dretke,546 U.S. 1140, 126 S.Ct. 1144, 163 L.Ed.2d 1004 (2006). The Fifth Circuit subsequently changed its mind about the meaning of Penry. And, in doing so, it specifically said that it had been wrong about Bower's Penryclaim. See Pierce v. Thaler,604 F.3d 197, 210, n…
  • Eggers v. State of Ala., 876 F.3d 1086 (11th Cir. 2017)
    …certificate of judgment on May 20,2005. Eggers subsequently petitioned the United States Supreme Court twice for certiorari review—a pro se petition and an attorney-authored one.' Both applications were denied on January 17, 2006. Eggers v. Alabama, 546 U.S. 1140, 126 S.Ct. 1143, 163 L.Ed.2d 1004 (2006). B, On April 20, 2006, Eggers timely filed a pro se post-conviction petition pursuant to Rule 32 of the Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure in the Circuit Court of Walker Co'unty, Alabama. At the State’s re…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw