NATIONAL ADVERTISING CO.
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA

U.S. | 2006-02-21
No. 05-492
546 U.S. 1170 Supreme Court of the United States (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Flanigan's Enters. v. City OF Sandy Springs, 868 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2017)
    …have repeatedly held that the repeal or amendment of an allegedly unconstitutional statute moots legal challenges to the legitimacy of the repealed legislation.” Nat’l Adver. Co. v. City of Miami, 402 F. 3d 1329, 1332 (11th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1170, 126 S.Ct. 1318, 164 L.Ed. 2d 48 (2006). A “superseding statute or regulation moots a case ... to the extent that it removes challenged features of the prior law.” Coal. for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of Atlanta, 219 F. 3d 1301,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw