WHITTEN
v.
UNITED STATES
WHITTEN
UNITED STATES
546 U.S. 1177
Supreme Court of the United States (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57 (U.S. 2008)…ical issue was a mistaken one.’ ” 487 F. 3d, at 677-678 (O’Scannlain, J., concurring specially) (quoting Quigley v. Vose, 834 F. 2d 14, 16 (CA1 1987) (per curiam)); see also Becht v. United States, 403 F. 3d 541, 548 (CA8 2005) (same), cert. denied, 546 U. S. 1177 (2006). Pulido now agrees with the State that the Court of Appeals erred by treating the instructional error in this case as structural, and that the required prejudice analysis should [*62] be governed by Brecht’s “substantial and injurious effect…