HILDA INMAN CORLETT, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS HILDA I. CORLETT, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND R. R. CORLETT, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS RALPH R. CORLETT, BAKER INVESTMENT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, FAIR HAVEN ESTATES, INCORPORATED, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, JOHN L. FOUTS, TRUSTEE, AND FELIX KNOWLES, APPELLANTS,
v.
JAMES C. BREWSTER, APPELLEE
HILDA INMAN CORLETT, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS HILDA I. CORLETT, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND R. R. CORLETT, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS RALPH R. CORLETT, BAKER INVESTMENT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, FAIR HAVEN ESTATES, INCORPORATED, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, JOHN L. FOUTS, TRUSTEE, AND FELIX KNOWLES, APPELLANTS,
JAMES C. BREWSTER, APPELLEE
101 Fla. 598
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court, upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said final decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
H. E. Wolfe Constr. Co., Inc. v. Nila Laure Ellison, 127 Fla. 808 (Fla. 1936)…at the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment rendered against the plaintiff in error H. E. Wolfe Construction Co., Inc. This can be done wtihout affecting the judgment rendered in favor of its co-defendant. Korabeck v. Shannon, 101 Fla. 598, 135 So. 131. We have therefore reached the conclusion that in view of the procedure which has been adopted in this case, and in view of the pleadings and evidence shown by the record, [*837] and the legal principles above adverted to, our previous…
-
Noyes v. Webster Inv. Co., 143 Fla. 702 (Fla. 1940)…laration. That “A promissory note duly signed by a married woman and her husband may be good as to the husband though not as to the wife” was decided in Blood v. Hunt, 97 Fla. 551, 121 South. Rep. 886. This Court also ruled in Korabeck v. Shannon, 101 Fla. 598, 135 South. Rep. 131, that the name of the wife should be “stricken from the judgment” entered in an action against her and her husband where her name had been deleted on motion during the progress of the suit, establishing that there is no impropri…