RUTTI

v.

WYOMING, IN RE ABSALON, FIELDS V. UNITED STATES; UBEROI V. CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO, ET AL.; REVERIA TAVERN, INC. V. SUMMIT COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.; FROTHINGHAM V. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE; FOX V. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL; JONES V. UNITED STATES; SPENCE V. CALIFORNIA; GLEASON V. HICKMAN, SECRETARY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; IN RE LANGON, PEARSON V. UNITED STATES; ROSENDARY V. UNITED STATES; BURROUGHS V. MAKOWSKI, WARDEN; MISIAK V. MORGAN, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY; GODFREY V. WOLFE, WARDEN; NORTONSEN V. REID, WARDEN, ET AL.; SCATES V. UNITED STATES; BANKS V. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY; SPROUSE V. POWELL, WARDEN; CAGE-BARILE V. CHURCH OF CHRIST IN HOLLYWOOD; MOSES V. WALKER, WARDEN; ANDRYSZAK V. PAC FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; FOX V. STOVALL, WARDEN; MURDOCK V. AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING, INC.; CRUZADO-LAUREANO V. UNITED STATES; BARRON V. UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE; REEVE V. UNITED STATES; STAR V. VIRGINIA; MOHAMED V. FLORIDA; MESSIER V. UNITED STATES; MCCULLOUGH V. WEST, SUPERINTENDENT, ELMIRA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; BERAS V. UNITED STATES; BRADFORD V. MAXWELL TREE EXPERT CO., INC.; CAMPBELL V. PLILER, WARDEN; WILLIAMS V. UNITED STATES; BEQUETTE V. UNITED STATES; ATAMIAN V. BAHAR ET AL.; MOORE V. UNITED STATES; OXENDINE V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2006-02-21

Nos. 04-1271; No. 04-6002; No. 04-9072; No. 05-105; No. 05-480; No. 05-537; No. 05-540; No. 05-5181; No. 05-5479; No. 05-6006; No. 05-6067; No. 05-6100; No. 05-6205; No. 05-6230; No. 05-6331; No. 05-6447; No. 05-6607; No. 05-6660; No. 05-6673; No. 05-6677; No. 05-6724; No. 05-6786; No. 05-6822; No. 05-6847; No. 05-6854; No. 05-6881; No. 05-6917; No. 05-6918; No. 05-6963; No. 05-6975; No. 05-7196; No. 05-7219; No. 05-7300; No. 05-7327; No. 05-7370; No. 05-7441; No. 05-7447; No. 05-7538; No. 05-7723; No. 05-7824

546 U.S. 1210 Supreme Court of the United States (2006)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court denied petitions for rehearing in thirty-four cases involving a range of constitutional and statutory issues, including challenges to state and federal regulations, prisoner rights disputes, and administrative law questions.

Opinion of the Court

544 U. S. 1019; 543 U. S. 807; ante, p. 828; ante, p. 874; ante, p. 1062; ante, p. 1076; ante, p. 1062; ante, p. 888; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 983; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 1036; ante, p. 952; ante, p. 1017; ante, p. 1005; ante, p. 1037; ante, p. 1040; ante, p. 994; ante, p. 1041; ante, p. 1021; ante, p. 1042; ante, p. 1064; ante, p. 1064; ante, p. 1065; ante, p. 1065; ante, p. 1009; ante, p. 1077; ante, p. 1022; ante, p. 1044; ante, p. 1066; ante, p. 1050; ante, p. 1079; ante, p. 1053; ante, p. 1079; ante, p. 1107; ante, p. 1070; ante, p. 1070; ante, p. 1141; ante, p. 1119; and ante, p.

1122. Petitions for rehearing denied. No. 05-537. No. 05-540. No. 05-5181. No. 05-5479. No. 05-6006. No. 05-6067. No. 05-6100. No. 05-6205. No. 05-6230. No. 05-6331. No. 05-6447. No. 05-6607. No. 05-6660. No. 05-6673. No. 05-6677. No. 05-6724. No. 05-6786. No. 05-6822. No. 05-6847. No. 05-6854. No. 05-6881. No. 05-6917. No. 05-6918. No. 05-6963. No. 05-6975. No. 05-7196. No. 05-7219. No. 05-7300. No. 05-7327. No. 05-7370. No. 05-7441. No. 05-7447. No. 05-7538. No. 05-7723. No. 05-7824.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Grajales v. Gonzales, 544 U.S. 1019 (U.S. 2005)
Tolliver v. Illinois, 544 U.S. 1019 (U.S. 2005)
In re Russell, 543 U.S. 807 (U.S. 2004)
In re Amir-El, 543 U.S. 807 (U.S. 2004)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw