TOLEDO-FLORES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• LEE v. CSX Transp., Inc., 958 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
  …have been applied in interpreting the scope of federal statutory provisions preempting state law. “Unless otherwise defined, statutory terms are generally interpreted in accordance with their ordinary meaning.” BP Am. Prod. Co. v. Burton, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 638, 643, 166 L.Ed.2d 494 (2006). “In order to determine the scope [of a statutory provision], we must examine the statute’s text in light of context, structure, and related statutory provisions.” Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Servs., Inc., 545 U.S. 5…
• Sebelius v. Cloer., 569 U.S. 369 (U.S. 2013)
  …t, of course, with the statutory text," and proceed from the understanding that " [u]nless otherwise defined, statutory terms are generally interpreted in accordance with their ordinary meaning." BP America Production Co. v. Burton, 549 U.S. 84, 91, 127 S.Ct. 638, 166 L.Ed.2d 494 (2006). The Act's fees provision ties eligibility for attorney's fees broadly to "any proceeding on such petition," referring specifically to "a petition filed under section 300aa-11." 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-15(e)(1), (3). Section 300a…
• Dep't OF Transp. v. Ass'n of Am. Railroads., 135 S. Ct. 1225 (U.S. 2015)
  …jointly issue rules of practice to implement this paragraph"), and that Amtrak and private rail carriers"shall incorporate" those standards into their agreements whenever "practicable," cf. e.g., BP America Production Co. v. Burton,549 U.S. 84, 88, 127 S.Ct. 638, 166 L.Ed.2d 494 (2006)(characterizing a command to " 'audit and reconcile, to the extent practicable, all current and past lease accounts' " as creating "duties" for the Secretary of the Interior (quoting 30 U.S.C. § 1711(c)(1))). The fact that p…