EX PARTE DAVID TAYLOR

Citator

Cited By

• Hudson v. Parker, 156 U.S. 277 (U.S. 1895)
  …not be affected by admitting him to bail in this case. Were the question here only as to what persons should be accepted as sureties on the bond, or as to their sufficiency, there would be no ground for issuing a writ of mandamus. Ex parte Taylor, 14 How. 3; Ex parte Milwaukee Railroad, 5 Wall. 188. But in the case before us, the District Judge has not exercised any discretion in the matter, but has declined to act at all, and has refused to approve the bond, solely because, in his' own words, “ it is…
• Ex parte Roe, 234 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1914)
  …the exercise of a lawful jurisdiction, especially where in regular course the decision may be reviewed upon a writ of error or an appeal. Bank of Columbia v. Sweeny, 1 Pet. 567; Life and Fire Insurance Co. v. Adams, 9 Pet. 571, 602; Ex parte Taylor, 14 How. 3, 13; Ex parte Many, Id. 24; Ex parte Newman, 14 Wall. 152, 169; Ex parte Sawyer, 21 Wall. 235; Ex parte Flippin, 94 U. S. 348; Ex parte Loring, Id. 418; Ex parte Railway Co., 103 U. S. 794; Ex parte Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 108 U. S. 566; Amer…
• In re the Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 304 U.S. 486 (U.S. 1938)
  …hibition may not be granted, for they are not available for correction of mere error or even abuse of discretion. Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 287 U. S. 178, 203-204. Ex parte Whitney, 13 Pet. 404, 408. Ex parte Taylor, 14 How. 3, 13. Ex parte Railway Co., 101 U. S. 711, 720. In re Hawkins, Petitioner, 147 U. S. 486, 490. In re Atlantic City Railroad, 164 U. S. 633, 635. In re James Pollitz, 206 U. S. 323, 331. Cf. Ex parte Simons, 247 U. S. 231, 240. [*498] Stripped of unne…