MICHAEL EDWARD STOUDT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sufficiency Of Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause has been orally argued before the court and briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consideration. It is our view that the legal effect and probative force of the evidence in the case sub judice is sufficient to sustain the conviction under the principles enunciated by the court in Blatch v. State, 216 So.2d 261 (Fla.App.1968), cert. dismissed 225 So.2d 532 (Fla.1969); Hixon v. State, 165 So.2d 436 (Fla.App.1964); and Byrd v. State, 178 So.2d 886 (Fla.App.1965).
Appellant’s reliance on Mitchell v. State, 104 So.2d 84 (Fla.App.1958), is unavailing in our view. To the extent that the ruling in Mitchell may be applicable here, it seems to us that the rule of that case was inferentially receded from by the same court in Byrd v. State, supra. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from herein is
Affirmed.
SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stoudt v. State, 262 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1972)…Certiorari denied. 258 So. 2d 850. ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Blatch v. State, 216 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Hixon v. State, 165 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
- Byrd v. State, 178 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Sawyer v. Dawson, 225 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1969)
- Mitchell v. State, 104 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)