JEROME DAVID SILLINGS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Finst Dev., Inc. v. Bemaor, 449 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …Bailey, 392 -So. 2d 49, the trial court had jurisdiction to 'enter a judgment therefor, unless as Finst contends, the posting of a bond superseding the first judgment deprived it of jurisdiction. Finst relies on El Prado Restaurant, Inc. v. Weaver, 259 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). To be sure, this court in El Prado held that once an appeal from the main judgment was pending and that judgment had been superseded by the posting of bond, the trial court was powerless to conduct subsequent proceedings and ente…
• City OF Miami Beach v. Cummings, 266 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
  …ng Authority of City of Miami v. Macho, Fla.App. 1966, 184 So. 2d 916; Sundie v. Haren, Fla.1971, 253 So. 2d 857, 858; but cf. Winters v. Parks, Fla.1956, 91 So. 2d 649, 652 (en banc); see generally El Prado Restaurant, Inc. v. Weaver, Fla.App.1972, 259 So. 2d 524 (3d D.C.A.1972.) We have observed that the city has pursued several condemnation actions against these property owners. We wish to make clear that the trial court on remand, may, in its discretion stay the current eminent domain proceeding pending…
• City OF Plant City v. Mann, 400 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1981)
  …226, 156 So. 440 (1934). Being preventive in its effect the stay does not undo or set aside what the trial court has adjudicated, Henry v. Whitehurst, 66 Fla. 567, 64 So. 233 (1914), it merely suspends the order. El Prado Restaurant, Inc. v. Weaver, 259 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). The commission’s order required Tampa Electric Company to file rates to be effective on October 1, 1978, implementing the direct method of collection. These rates were timely filed. This is the lawful rate which was in effect wh…