DEPIERRE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211 (U.S. 2011)
  …this Court that it had changed its position and that, in its view, Bond does have standing to challenge the constitutionality of § 229 on Tenth Amendment grounds. See Brief for [*216] United States (filed July 9,2010). The Court granted certio-rari, 562 U. S. 960 (2010), and appointed an amicus curiae to defend the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Stephen McAllister, a member of the bar of this Court, filed an ami-cus brief and presented an oral argument that have been of considerable assistance to the Cour…
• Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692 (U.S. 2011)
  …vor, Camreta and Alford petitioned this Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that their conduct violated the Fourth Amendment. S. G. declined to cross-petition for review of the decision that the officials have immunity. We granted certiorari. 562 U. S. 960 (2010). II We first consider our ability to act on a petition brought by government officials who have won final judgment on grounds of qualified immunity, but who object to an appellate court’s ruling that they violated the plaintiff’s constituti…
• Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. Seb S. A., 563 U.S. 754 (U.S. 2011)
  …finding that “Pentalpha deliberately disregarded a known risk that SEB had a protective patent.” Id., at 1377. Such disregard, the court said, “is not different from actual knowledge, but is a form of actual knowledge.” Ibid. We granted certiorari. 562 U. S. 960 (2010). II Pentalpha argues that active inducement liability under § 271(b) requires more than deliberate indifference to a [*760] known risk that the induced acts may violate an existing patent. Instead, Pentalpha maintains, actual knowledge of t…