HORSEMEN'S SPECIALTY CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

CHUCK HODGE, A/K/A ELMER HODGE, AND HIS WIFE, ESSIE MAE HODGE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Valentino DeGEORGE v. State, 358 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
  …ppurtenances thereunto belonging” had no meaning as applied to a filling station and park, as such. Although traditionally the offense of burglary involved the invasion of possessory rights, as distinguished from ownership rights, Jackson v. State, 259 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972), a few states have found other means to expand the definition of burglary to adjoining areas of a commercial [*220] structure without relying on expansion of the term “curtilage.” This has been accomplished through specific stat…
• I. v. Anderson, 356 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …er in structures and conveyances, as opposed to ownership rights therein. Potter v. State, 91 Fla. 938, 109 So. 91 (1926); Presley v. State, 61 Fla. 46, 54 So. 367 (1911); Vasquez v. State, 350 So. 2d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Jackson v. State, 259 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); Gagne v. State, 138 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Holzapfel v. State, 120 So. 2d 195, 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). One of the essential elements of the crime of burglary relevant here is that the burglarized structure or conveyance m…
• State v. Bennie Jackson and Henry Fisher, 281 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 1973)
  …CARLTON, Chief Justice. This case is before us on a petition by the State of Florida for a writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Second District. Since the opinion of the District Court in this cause, reported at 259 So. 2d 739, conflicts with Perry v. State, 174 So. 2d 55 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1965), and Tavalaccio v. State, 59 So. 2d 247 (Fla.1952), we have jurisdiction. Article V, § 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Respondents, Jackson and Fisher, were convicted of break…