JOHNNIE E. COLLIER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that there was substantial, competent evidence to support the jury's verdict of guilt for forcible rape.
[1] A jury verdict of guilt is presumed to be correct on appeal.
[2] Appellate courts view all inferences from the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict of guilt.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant was convicted of forcible rape. His defense was that the prosecutrix consented to the sexual act in exchange for money. The jury rejected th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Correctness Of Jury Verdict cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of forcible rape, with a recommendation of mercy.
The sole issue presented for our consideration is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.
Appellant’s only defense to the crime with which he was charged is that the prosecutrix gave her consent to the sexual act in which they engaged in return for the promise on his part to pay her an agreed sum of money. His defense, therefore, is one of consent.
We have carefully reviewed the testimony adduced at the trial and have considered the points made by appellant on which he relies to negate the State’s contention that he forced the prosecutrix against her will to have intercourse with him. Appellant’s argument was entirely valid when directed to the jury which tried the case. It is of little avail in this court, however, if there is other competent evidence in the record from which the jury could reasonably have reached the conclusion that appellant’s admitted act of intercourse with the prosecutrix was without her consent and against her will.
The verdict and judgment of guilt reach this court with a presumption of correctness, and all inferences to be drawn from the evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict of judgment and guilt. It is evident that the jury believed the testimony of the prosecutrix and rejected that of appellant. It must be presumed that the jury followed the court’s instructions and found appellant guilty only after being satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that he had committed the crime as charged. Apparently the able judge who tried the case agreed with the jury as he denied appellant’s motion for a directed verdict and for a new trial. Measuring the record before us in light of the foregoing principles, we find substantial, competent evidence to support the jury’s verdict and the trial court’s action.1 The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.
SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sutton v. State, 718 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…997). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is hereby affirmed. PADOVANO, J., concurs. BENTON, J., dissents. . The law presumes that the jury followed the trial judge's instructions in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Collier v. State, 259 So. 2d 765, 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)(holding that it "must be presumed that the jury followed the court’s instructions and found appellant guilty only after being satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that he had committed the crime as charged.”); Hand v. State,…
Authorities Cited
- Crum v. State, 172 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)