BOWERSOX
v.
NUNLEY
BOWERSOX
NUNLEY
562 U.S. 996
Supreme Court of the United States (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Gavin Newsom, 140 S. Ct. 1613 (U.S. 2020)
-
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 568 U.S. 1401 (U.S. 2012)…on pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2101(f), a request for an injunction pending appeal “ ‘does not simply suspend judicial alteration of the status quo but grants judicial intervention that has been withheld by lower courts.’” Respect Maine PAC v. McKee, 562 U. S. 996 (2010) (quoting Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy, Inc. v. NRC, 479 U. S. 1312, 1313 (1986) (Scalia, J., in chambers)). Accordingly, a Circuit Justice may issue an injunction only when it is “[njecessary or appropriate in aid of our jurisdiction…
-
Brant v. Palmer (M.D. Fla. 2024)…in this area." Id. at 37. In their Responses, Defendants assert "the source of the drugs and whether or not a drug has received FDA approval is of questionable relevance to an Eighth Amendment challenge." Responses at 6 (citing Brewer v. Landrigan, 562 U.S. 996 (2010)). According to Defendants, it is not enough for Plaintiffs to show that the FDOC may obtain defective drugs, but rather they must show there is a substantial risk that the defective drugs will be used during Plaintiffs' executions, causing “…