DAVIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (U.S. 2011)
  …t would do nothing to “dete[r]. . . Fourth Amendment violations.” 598 F. 3d, at 1265-1266 (bracketing and internal quotation marks omitted). It therefore declined to apply the exclusionary rule and affirmed Davis’ conviction. We granted certiorari. 562 U. S. 1002 (2010). II The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” The Amendment says nothing about suppressing evidence obtained in violation…
• FOX v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826 (U.S. 2011)
  …3d 423 (CA5 2010) (opinion below), with Colombrito v. Kelly, 764 F. 2d 122, 132 (CA2 1985) (declining to award fees when the frivolous claim “added no additional testimony or expense to the trial”). We granted certiorari to resolve these questions. 562 U. S. 1002 (2010). H-4 h-H Our legal system generally requires each party to bear his own litigation expenses, including attorney's fees, regardless whether he wins or loses. Indeed, this principle is so firmly entrenched that it is known as the “American Ru…