GOOD ET VIR

v.

CITY OF SUNBURY, PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By

• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (U.S. 2011)
  …es in the randomly selected 'sample cases,’ thus revealing the approximate percentage of class members whose unequal pay or nonpromotion was due to something other than gender discrimination.” Ibid., n. 56 (emphasis deleted). We granted certiorari. 562 U. S. 1091 (2010). 1 — < The class action is “an exception to the usual rule that litigation is conducted by and on behalf of the individual named parties only.” Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U. S. 682, 700-701 (1979). In order to justify a departure from that r…
• Am. Elec. Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut, 564 U.S. 410 (U.S. 2011)
  …he court reasoned, “we cannot speculate as to whether the hypothetical regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act would in fact ‘spea[k] directly’ to the ‘particular issue’ raised here by Plaintiffs.” Id., at 380. We granted certiorari. 562 U. S. 1091 (2010). III The petitioners contend that the federal courts lack authority to adjudicate this case. Four Members of the Court would hold that at least some plaintiffs have Article III standing under Massachusetts, which permitted a State to challe…